A Sentinel Event is defined by the Joint Commission International (JCI) as any unanticipated
event in a healthcare setting resulting in death or serious physical or
psychological injury to a patient or patients, not related to the natural
course of the patient's illness. These
are usually the most serious events in hospitals, and include:
Ø Unexpected death
Ø Patient suicide
Ø Wrong patient, wrong side, wrong site surgery
Ø Infant abduction
Ø Sexual assault on patient
Ø Haemolytic blood transfusion reaction resulting
from incompatible bllopd transfusion
Ø Intrapartum maternal death
Ø Assault, homicide or other crime resulting in permanent
loss of function or death
Sentinel events are intensively monitored by the Joint
Commission International ( JCI) and the
National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers (NABH).Theses
events require a Root cause Analysis ( RCA) to detect the underlying causes,
and come up with solutions to prevent the recurrence of the event. At the same
time, potential measures of improvement, called an “ Action Plan”, are to be
implemented.
The Joint Commission disseminates "sentinel
event alerts" identifying specific sentinel events, their underlying
causes, and steps to prevent recurrence. For hospitals accredited by the
JCI, the RCA has to be done within 45 days of the event, and suitable advisory
issued accordingly.
Statistics of sentinel events are recorded and
published by the FDA's MedWatch program. The JCAHO publishes a great deal of information about
sentinel events on their website: www.jcaho.org. They also send out Sentinel Event Alerts that are
available to all health care providers and organizations as a means of
increasing the general knowledge about sentinel events.
Sentinel events usually point out a system or
process defect, rather than a defect related to any one individual. They have
to be taken in this context and analyzed thereof.
An example of a Sentinel Event in a hospital:
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S/ 01/ 11
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of event
|
Sentinel event
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Event
|
Inj.Vancomycin given by improper technique ( iv bolus instead of
infusion)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What happened?
|
Patient was scheduled for OMC+ ASD closure.Doctor had prescribed
Inj. Vancomycin I gm iv bd without mentioning dilution. Nurse gave the
medication as iv bolus after dilution in 20 ml NS, whereas it should have
been diluted in 100 ml. Patient developed discolouration of hand- this
progressed to thrombophlebitis with left hand pain, burning and blackish discolouration.
The operation was cancelled due to this and patient was discharged. At the
time of discharge, patient was having discolouration and pain, with flexion
problems of the hand. Patient was later readmitted , having suffered deep
skin necrosis and underwent debridement and flap cover surgery.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis using the " 5 times why" technique
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why did thrombophlebitis develop?
|
Due to improper dilution and technique of administration
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why was the improper technique followed?
|
Since nurse was not aware
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since doctor had not mentioned it in medication order
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why was nurse not aware?
|
Dilution guidelines not available at ward
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Knowledge and training was insufficient
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why had doctor not mentioned in medication order?
|
Due to oversight
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Factors
affecting this event ( Ishikawa Diagram)
|
Ishikawa diagrams are not suitable for investigating sentinel events. They assume that a single event in the diagram can cause a sentinel event. This is never true. At least two things go wrong when such an event happens. Fault Tree Analysis is a much better tool.
ReplyDeleteI do not agree with your statement. RCA (usually done with a Ishikawa chart) has been recommended by the JCI ( Joint Commission International) for investigating Sentinel Events.
ReplyDelete